Can I run Llama 3.1 405B on NVIDIA RTX 4090?

cancel
Fail/OOM
This GPU doesn't have enough VRAM
GPU VRAM
24.0GB
Required
810.0GB
Headroom
-786.0GB

VRAM Usage

0GB 100% used 24.0GB

info Technical Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4090, a high-end consumer GPU, boasts 24GB of GDDR6X VRAM and a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. While powerful, it falls significantly short of the VRAM requirements for running Llama 3.1 405B (405.00B) in FP16 precision, which demands a staggering 810GB. This discrepancy of -786GB VRAM headroom means the entire model cannot be loaded onto the GPU's memory simultaneously. Consequently, without substantial optimization techniques, direct inference is impossible. The 4090's 16384 CUDA cores and 512 Tensor cores would be capable of accelerating computations if the model could fit in memory, but the VRAM bottleneck is insurmountable in its current state.

Even if techniques like CPU offloading were employed, the performance would be severely degraded. The limited memory bandwidth between the GPU and system RAM would create a significant bottleneck, resulting in extremely slow token generation. Furthermore, the model's context length of 128000 tokens further exacerbates the memory demands. The lack of sufficient VRAM not only prevents the model from running efficiently but also impacts the achievable batch size, rendering real-time or interactive applications unfeasible. The high TDP of the RTX 4090 (450W) also needs to be considered, as pushing it to its limits while attempting to offload parts of the model could lead to thermal throttling and further performance degradation.

lightbulb Recommendation

Directly running Llama 3.1 405B (405.00B) on an RTX 4090 is not feasible due to the massive VRAM requirements. To make it runnable, aggressive quantization techniques are essential. Consider using a framework like `llama.cpp` with Q2_K or even lower quantization levels to drastically reduce the model's memory footprint. Even with quantization, expect significantly reduced performance compared to running the model on hardware with sufficient VRAM. Alternatively, explore cloud-based inference services or distributed computing solutions that utilize multiple GPUs to meet the VRAM demands. If local execution is a must, consider using smaller Llama 3 models, such as the 8B or 70B versions, which are more manageable for the RTX 4090.

If you choose to experiment with quantization, carefully monitor the trade-off between memory usage and model accuracy. Lower quantization levels will reduce VRAM usage but can also degrade the quality of the generated text. Experiment with different context lengths and batch sizes to find a balance that works best for your application. Focus on optimizing for the smallest possible footprint, even if it means sacrificing some performance. Given the VRAM constraints, a batch size of 1 is likely the only practical option for many use cases.

tune Recommended Settings

Batch_Size
1
Context_Length
Potentially reduced to 4096 or 2048 depending on …
Other_Settings
['Enable CPU offloading (expect significant performance degradation)', 'Use the smallest possible context length', 'Monitor VRAM usage closely to prevent out-of-memory errors', 'Experiment with different quantization methods to find the best balance between performance and accuracy']
Inference_Framework
llama.cpp
Quantization_Suggested
Q2_K

help Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 3.1 405B (405.00B) compatible with NVIDIA RTX 4090? expand_more
No, Llama 3.1 405B (405.00B) is not directly compatible with the NVIDIA RTX 4090 due to the model's massive VRAM requirements (810GB) exceeding the RTX 4090's 24GB VRAM capacity.
What VRAM is needed for Llama 3.1 405B (405.00B)? expand_more
Llama 3.1 405B (405.00B) requires 810GB of VRAM in FP16 precision.
How fast will Llama 3.1 405B (405.00B) run on NVIDIA RTX 4090? expand_more
Due to the VRAM limitations, Llama 3.1 405B (405.00B) will likely not run at all on an RTX 4090 without significant quantization and CPU offloading. Even with these optimizations, performance will be severely limited, resulting in very slow token generation speeds.