Can I run Llama 3.1 70B on NVIDIA H100 PCIe?

cancel
Fail/OOM
This GPU doesn't have enough VRAM
GPU VRAM
80.0GB
Required
140.0GB
Headroom
-60.0GB

VRAM Usage

0GB 100% used 80.0GB

info Technical Analysis

The primary limiting factor for running Llama 3.1 70B on a single NVIDIA H100 PCIe card is the VRAM. Llama 3.1 70B in FP16 precision requires approximately 140GB of VRAM to load the model weights and perform inference. The H100 PCIe, while a powerful GPU, only offers 80GB of HBM2e memory. This results in a VRAM deficit of 60GB, meaning the model cannot be loaded onto the GPU in its native FP16 format.

Even if quantization techniques are employed to reduce the memory footprint, the H100's 2.0 TB/s memory bandwidth will become a bottleneck if the model is heavily quantized (e.g., INT4). While the H100's Hopper architecture and Tensor Cores are designed for efficient matrix multiplications, the insufficient VRAM prevents leveraging these features effectively. Without sufficient VRAM, the model will either fail to load or experience extremely slow performance due to constant swapping between system RAM and GPU memory, rendering it unusable for practical applications.

Furthermore, the context length of 128000 tokens, while impressive, exacerbates the VRAM issue. Longer context lengths require more memory for storing attention keys and values during inference. Given the already constrained VRAM, utilizing the full context length is not feasible without significant compromises in model precision or batch size, further diminishing performance.

lightbulb Recommendation

Due to the VRAM limitation, running Llama 3.1 70B on a single H100 PCIe requires aggressive quantization techniques. Consider using a quantization method like 4-bit quantization (INT4) or even lower to drastically reduce the model's memory footprint. Frameworks like `llama.cpp` or `vLLM` offer efficient quantization and inference capabilities.

Alternatively, explore distributed inference solutions. Model parallelism can distribute the model across multiple H100 GPUs, effectively increasing the aggregate VRAM. Frameworks like PyTorch's `torch.distributed` or NVIDIA's TensorRT-LLM can be used to implement model parallelism. However, this approach introduces communication overhead between GPUs, which can impact latency and throughput.

tune Recommended Settings

Batch_Size
1 (increase if possible after quantization, monit…
Context_Length
Reduce context length if possible to minimize VRA…
Other_Settings
['Enable memory offloading to CPU RAM if absolutely necessary, but expect significant performance degradation.', 'Use a smaller context length during initial testing to ensure the model loads and runs.', 'Monitor VRAM usage closely using `nvidia-smi` to fine-tune quantization and batch size settings.']
Inference_Framework
llama.cpp or vLLM
Quantization_Suggested
INT4 or even lower (e.g., 3-bit)

help Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 3.1 70B (70.00B) compatible with NVIDIA H100 PCIe? expand_more
No, not without significant quantization. The H100 PCIe has insufficient VRAM (80GB) to run Llama 3.1 70B (requiring 140GB in FP16) without quantization.
What VRAM is needed for Llama 3.1 70B (70.00B)? expand_more
Llama 3.1 70B requires approximately 140GB of VRAM in FP16 precision. Quantization can reduce this requirement significantly.
How fast will Llama 3.1 70B (70.00B) run on NVIDIA H100 PCIe? expand_more
Without quantization, it won't run due to VRAM limitations. With aggressive quantization (e.g., INT4), performance will depend on the framework used, batch size, and context length. Expect significantly lower tokens/sec compared to running the model in FP16 on a GPU with sufficient VRAM. It will likely be slower than other smaller models that can fit on the H100 without quantization.