Can I run Llama 3.1 70B (Q4_K_M (GGUF 4-bit)) on NVIDIA RTX 3090?

cancel
Fail/OOM
This GPU doesn't have enough VRAM
GPU VRAM
24.0GB
Required
35.0GB
Headroom
-11.0GB

VRAM Usage

0GB 100% used 24.0GB

info Technical Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 3090, with its 24GB of GDDR6X VRAM, falls short of the 35GB VRAM requirement for running Llama 3.1 70B (70.00B) quantized to Q4_K_M. This quantization reduces the model's memory footprint, but the 11GB VRAM deficit prevents the model from loading and running effectively on the RTX 3090. While the RTX 3090 boasts a high memory bandwidth of 0.94 TB/s and a substantial number of CUDA and Tensor cores, the primary bottleneck here is insufficient VRAM, precluding meaningful inference.

Even with aggressive quantization, the model's parameters and computational graph exceed the RTX 3090's memory capacity. Memory bandwidth becomes relevant only once the model resides in VRAM. Since the model cannot be fully loaded, the theoretical memory bandwidth and computational power of the RTX 3090 are not utilized. Consequently, users can expect the model to either fail to load or encounter out-of-memory errors during inference. Performance metrics like tokens/sec and batch size are irrelevant in this scenario due to the fundamental VRAM constraint.

lightbulb Recommendation

Due to the VRAM limitations, running Llama 3.1 70B (70.00B) on an RTX 3090 is not feasible without significant compromises. Consider using a smaller model variant, such as Llama 3.1 8B, which has a much lower VRAM footprint. Alternatively, offloading some layers to system RAM (CPU) using frameworks like `llama.cpp` might allow the model to load, but this will drastically reduce inference speed. Another option is to distribute the model across multiple GPUs if available.

If you're committed to running the 70B model, upgrading to a GPU with more VRAM (e.g., NVIDIA RTX 4090, or professional-grade GPUs like the A100 or H100) is the most straightforward solution. Cloud-based GPU instances also provide access to high-VRAM GPUs without requiring a hardware purchase. Experiment with different quantization levels, but be aware that extreme quantization can impact model accuracy. Finally, consider using inference frameworks optimized for memory efficiency, such as vLLM, which can reduce memory overhead.

tune Recommended Settings

Batch_Size
1 (for minimal VRAM usage)
Context_Length
Reduce context length to the minimum required for…
Other_Settings
['Enable CPU offloading (llama.cpp)', 'Use a smaller model variant', 'Try memory-efficient attention mechanisms (if available in the framework)']
Inference_Framework
llama.cpp (for CPU offloading) or vLLM (for optim…
Quantization_Suggested
Try Q3_K_M or lower, but be aware of accuracy loss

help Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 3.1 70B (70.00B) compatible with NVIDIA RTX 3090? expand_more
No, the RTX 3090's 24GB VRAM is insufficient for the 35GB required, even with Q4_K_M quantization.
What VRAM is needed for Llama 3.1 70B (70.00B)? expand_more
At least 35GB of VRAM is required for the Q4_K_M quantized version. FP16 requires approximately 140GB.
How fast will Llama 3.1 70B (70.00B) run on NVIDIA RTX 3090? expand_more
It will likely not run at all due to insufficient VRAM. If you manage to offload parts of the model to CPU, it will be significantly slower than running entirely on a GPU with sufficient VRAM.