Can I run Llama 3.3 70B on NVIDIA RTX 4060?

cancel
Fail/OOM
This GPU doesn't have enough VRAM
GPU VRAM
8.0GB
Required
140.0GB
Headroom
-132.0GB

VRAM Usage

0GB 100% used 8.0GB

info Technical Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4060, with its 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, falls significantly short of the 140GB VRAM requirement for running Llama 3.3 70B in FP16 precision. This enormous disparity means the entire model cannot be loaded onto the GPU at once. The RTX 4060's memory bandwidth of 0.27 TB/s, while decent for its class, would be a bottleneck even if sufficient VRAM were available, as the model's weights and activations would need to be constantly swapped between system RAM and GPU memory, drastically reducing inference speed. With only 3072 CUDA cores and 96 Tensor Cores, the RTX 4060 lacks the computational power to efficiently process such a large model, further exacerbating performance issues.

Even with aggressive quantization techniques, fitting Llama 3.3 70B onto an 8GB card is highly improbable without severely impacting performance. The model's large context length of 128000 tokens adds further strain on memory resources. The lack of sufficient VRAM not only prevents the model from running efficiently but also makes it impossible to determine meaningful estimates for tokens per second or batch size on this configuration. Any attempt to run the model directly on the RTX 4060 would likely result in out-of-memory errors or extremely slow processing speeds, rendering it impractical for real-world applications.

lightbulb Recommendation

Due to the substantial VRAM deficit, running Llama 3.3 70B directly on an RTX 4060 is not feasible. Consider exploring cloud-based solutions like Google Colab Pro, AWS SageMaker, or similar platforms that offer access to GPUs with significantly more VRAM (e.g., A100, H100). Alternatively, investigate distributed inference solutions that split the model across multiple GPUs, although this approach requires considerable technical expertise and specialized hardware.

If using the RTX 4060 is unavoidable, you might experiment with extreme quantization methods (e.g., 4-bit or even lower) combined with CPU offloading, but expect a substantial performance degradation. Even then, success is not guaranteed. A more practical approach for local experimentation might be to use a smaller model, such as Llama 3 8B or a similar-sized model, which can be quantized to fit within the RTX 4060's VRAM.

tune Recommended Settings

Batch_Size
1
Context_Length
Potentially reduce context length to minimum requ…
Other_Settings
['Enable CPU offloading', 'Use a smaller model', 'Explore cloud-based inference']
Inference_Framework
llama.cpp (with CPU offloading)
Quantization_Suggested
4-bit (if possible, or lower)

help Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B compatible with NVIDIA RTX 4060? expand_more
No, the RTX 4060's 8GB VRAM is insufficient for Llama 3.3 70B, which requires approximately 140GB in FP16.
What VRAM is needed for Llama 3.3 70B? expand_more
Llama 3.3 70B requires approximately 140GB of VRAM when using FP16 precision. Quantization can reduce this requirement, but it still needs a substantial amount.
How fast will Llama 3.3 70B run on NVIDIA RTX 4060? expand_more
Llama 3.3 70B will likely not run on an RTX 4060 due to insufficient VRAM. Even with aggressive quantization, performance would be severely limited and likely unusable.